<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judith Butler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joei Loussedes</title>
		<link>http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Joei Loussedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hey Elizabeth,
You did a really good job on your blog, don&#039;t worry about not understanding it all! I didn&#039;t understand a lot of it either, so I always just pick out specific quotes that I liked or understood and talk about those.
I agree, it was nice that she related back to Foucault a lot because we just read his piece. I don&#039;t know if this is completely off base, but I think Foucault&#039;s discussion was more on sexual relations and how one should talk about it, while Butler&#039;s was more on sexuality (masculine vs. feminine). I don&#039;t know if that made any sense, my head is spinning! haha but you did a great job on your blog=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Elizabeth,<br />
You did a really good job on your blog, don&#8217;t worry about not understanding it all! I didn&#8217;t understand a lot of it either, so I always just pick out specific quotes that I liked or understood and talk about those.<br />
I agree, it was nice that she related back to Foucault a lot because we just read his piece. I don&#8217;t know if this is completely off base, but I think Foucault&#8217;s discussion was more on sexual relations and how one should talk about it, while Butler&#8217;s was more on sexuality (masculine vs. feminine). I don&#8217;t know if that made any sense, my head is spinning! haha but you did a great job on your blog=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabeth0509.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/judith-butler/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth

I felt exactly as you did after reading this piece.  I was left not understanding much, and not having highlighted much to go back to and read again.  Like you, one of the only things that stuck out to me was Foucault.  And don&#039;t feel bad about not having that much information in your blog, I do it all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth</p>
<p>I felt exactly as you did after reading this piece.  I was left not understanding much, and not having highlighted much to go back to and read again.  Like you, one of the only things that stuck out to me was Foucault.  And don&#8217;t feel bad about not having that much information in your blog, I do it all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
